J Med Cases
Journal of Medical Cases, ISSN 1923-4155 print, 1923-4163 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Med Cases and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.journalmc.org

Case Report

Volume 12, Number 6, June 2021, pages 230-232


Pericardial Tamponade Caused by Rotational Atherectomy Ablation Grinding Through a Barrier Stent Protruding From the Diagonal Artery: A Case Report

Ming Lian Gonga, b, Yi Maoc, d, Jing Hua Liub, d

aDepartment of Cardiology, Dalian The Fifth People’s Hospital, Dalian, China
bDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
cDepartment of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
dCorresponding Author: Yi Mao, Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, No.167 Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing 100037, China; Jing Hua Liu, Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, No. 2 Chaoyang Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China

Manuscript submitted February 7, 2021, accepted February 23, 2021, published online March 24, 2021
Short title: RA Ablation Caused Pericardial Tamponade
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc3678

Abstract▴Top 

Rotational atherectomy (RA) has been described in case reports to be effective in ablating under-expanded stents. We present a case of calcified bifurcation lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in which the branch stent protruding into main branch blocked the balloon getting through, and the following RA led to pericardial tamponade. The first stent was deployed from the proximal of left anterior descending artery (LAD) to the proximal of diagonal for an 80-year-old man who suffered from non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction to make a Culotte dual stent PCI. The operator failed to make balloon get through the struts protruding into LAD lumen anyway. After RA drill through the LAD lumen, it showed an excellent angiographic outcome. Stent deployment in LAD was successful, but pericardial tamponade occurred in a short time. After pericardiocentesis was performed under fluoroscopic guidance, the patient was uneventful. After 1 year, the follow-up coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography showed no in-stent restenosis, stent fracture or disrupted struts protruding outside of the vessel’s outline of LAD and the first diagonal (D1). This case shows stents’ RA could be dangerous in grinding across the stents’ lateral hole in an unsymmetrical lumen. Although RA could be a useful remedy in the situation of under-expansion of implanted stents, the debulking should be performed for longitudinal stent ablation and cautiously performed for bifurcation lesion in which the protruding stents from side branch were unsymmetrically blocking the path.

Keywords: Rotational atherectomy; Pericardial tamponade; Stent under-expansion; Coronary angiography

Introduction▴Top 

Rotational atherectomy (RA) has been described in case reports to be effective in ablating under-expanded stents [1, 2]. However, there are no reports RA were used in grinding off the barrier struts from the branch. We present a case of calcified bifurcation lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in which the branch stent protruding into main branch blocked the balloon getting through, and the following RA make a complication of pericardial tamponade.

Case Report▴Top 

An 80-year-old man with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction was presented to our hospital, with a history of hypertension and dyslipidemia. Coronary angiography revealed diffuse calcification from proximal to middle segment of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) with about 80% stenosis and 80% stenosis in the proximal of diagonal. Considering the LAD true bifurcation lesion and similar vessel diameter of LAD and the first diagonal (D1), we planned to utilize culotte technique. A drug-eluting stent (DES, 2.5 × 15 mm) was implanted in the D1 with short main branch protrusion, then no balloons could pass through the first stent’s side hole (Fig. 1). Based on current RA recommendations, the burr-to-artery ratio was 0.5 [3]. RA with 1.5 mm burr was attempted, and the ablation was initiated at the proximal edge of the stent. Following eight runs of RA with a speed of 160,000 rpm and post-dilatation of a 3.0 × 12 mm noncompliant (NC) balloon at 20 atm, a full expansion with a good angiographic result was achieved. Another DES (3.0 × 30 mm) was implanted in the LAD with full expansion and followed with the dilation of NC balloon (3.0 × 12 mm) at 26 atm (Fig. 2). Final angiography showed a satisfactory result with no stent malposition or residual stenosis. Half an hour after PCI, the patient felt shortness of breath with low blood pressure. Ultrasound cardiogram showed pericardium effusion and angiography showed no obvious coronary perforation. After pericardiocentesis was performed under fluoroscopic guidance, the patient was uneventful. The follow-up ultrasound cardiogram showed no more pericardium effusion with normal ventricular wall motion. The patient received the standard medical therapy with doctor’s prescription of aspirin, clopidogrel, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), beta-blocker, statin drugs and outpatient follow-up once a month after discharge. After 1 year, the follow-up coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography showed no in-stent restenosis, stent fracture or disrupted struts protruding outside of the vessel’s outline of LAD and D1.

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. Angiography and under-expanded balloon and stent under-expansion. (a) Baseline coronary angiogram of left anterior descending artery (LAD) and first diagonal (D1). (b) Balloon expansion at high pressure failed to expand the lesion. (c) The first stent was deployed from the proximal of LAD to the proximal of diagonal with under-expansion.

Figure 2.
Click for large image
Figure 2. Final result. The final angiogram showed fully expanded left anterior descending artery (LAD) and first diagonal (D1).
Discussion▴Top 

There are limited options for stent under-expansion due to rigid calcified lesions. RA has been described in case reports to be practical and effective in ablating under-expanded stents [4, 5]. Compared to previously reported cases, our case illustrates the risk of pericardial tamponade after ablation of the barrier stent struts in the calcified bifurcation lesion with RA. A rotational speed of 140,000 to 150,000 rpm was the ideal speed that led to fewer complications [3]. In our case, RA debulked both the struts protruding from side branch and calcified plaques. Due to the stiffer metallic scaffold, higher speed RA was needed to avoid burr entrapment according to our experience. When RA is performed, lesion specific predictors of perforation include eccentricity tortuosity, length > 10 mm and location in the right coronary artery or left circumflex artery [3]. In our case, ablating the struts protruding from side branch was not same as longitudinal stent ablation in a symmetrical lumen. Due to the incomplete Stent ablation in an unsymmetrical lumen, the remaining stent scaffold outward protruding was apt to injure the vessel wall and cause invisible impairment which resulted in pericardial tamponade. It was also a common phenomenon in the coronary chronic total occlusion PCI, non-contrast staining but tamponade happened. Although RA could be a useful remedy in the situation of under-expansion of implanted stents, the debulking should be performed for longitudinal stent ablation and cautiously performed for bifurcation lesion in which the protruding stents from side branch were unsymmetrically blocking the path.

Acknowledgments

None to declare.

Financial Disclosure

None to declare.

Conflict of Interest

None to declare.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Author Contributions

Manuscript conception and design: YM. Acquisition of data: MLG. Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g. statistical analysis computational analysis): MLG. Writing, review and/or revision of the manuscript: MLG. Manuscript supervision: JHL, YM.

Data Availability

Any inquiries regarding supporting data availability of this study should be directed to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

DES: drug-eluting stent; LAD: left anterior descending artery; D: diagonal; NC: noncompliant; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; RA: rotational atherectomy


References▴Top 
  1. Medina A, de Lezo JS, Melian F, Hernandez E, Pan M, Romero M. Successful stent ablation with rotational atherectomy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;60(4):501-504.
    doi pubmed
  2. Koide M, Inoue K, Matsuo A, Fujita H. Optical coherence tomography findings after longitudinal ablation for an underexpanded stent in a heavily calcified lesion: a case report. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16(1):241.
    doi pubmed
  3. Sharma SK, Tomey MI, Teirstein PS, Kini AS, Reitman AB, Lee AC, Genereux P, et al. North American Expert review of rotational atherectomy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(5):e007448.
    doi
  4. Hernandez J, Galeote G, Moreno R. Rotational atherectomy: if you do not do it before, you can do it after stenting. J Invasive Cardiol. 2014;26(9):E122-123.
  5. Si D, Liu G, Tong Y, He Y. Rotational atherectomy ablation for an unexpandable stent under the guide of IVUS: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(7):e9978.
    doi pubmed


This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Journal of Medical Cases is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Medical Cases, monthly, ISSN 1923-4155 (print), 1923-4163 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.journalmc.org   editorial contact: editor@journalmc.org    elmer.editorial@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.