Journals | Policy | Permission

Journal of Medical Cases

Case Report

Volume 12, Number 12, December 2021, pages 499-502

Heart Block Caused by Ticagrelor Use in a Patient Who Underwent Adenosine Diastolic Fractional Reserve Assessment: A Case Report

Ticagrelor is commonly used as a first-line antiplatelet agent in the management of ischemic heart disease and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) due to its rapid onset and proven cardiovascular benefits [1]. Though the benefits have been shown to reduce mortality [1], the mechanism of the drug’s effect on extracellular adenosine levels can unveil or induce bradyarrhythmias. This may be through a sinoatrial nodal or an atrioventricular mechanism [2, 3]. Many of the bradyarrhythmias resolve after discontinuation of ticagrelor or spontaneously [2]. We present a patient whose conduction abnormality failed to recover despite cessation of ticagrelor, requiring the need for pacemaker placement.

A 64-year-old woman presented with retrosternal chest pain radiating to the jaw and back, which woke her up from sleep. The pain was partially relieved with sublingual nitroglycerin. She has a history of coronary artery disease with stable, 70% mid-left anterior descending coronary artery and diagonal stenosis lesions that were diagnosed upon pre-op evaluation for a nephrectomy due to left renal cell carcinoma 2 years prior. Her past medical history was also remarkable for hypertension and chronic kidney disease stage 3.

An electrocardiogram (EKG) showed normal sinus rhythm with sinus arrhythmia at a rate of 70 bpm with signs of left ventricular hypertrophy with occasional premature ventricular contractions. There were no ST-segment or T-wave changes and there was normal conduction. Multiple serial troponins on admission and 6 h apart remained below 0.04 ng/mL. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen with contrast angiography revealed a stable aortic aneurysm of 4.5 cm diameter with no signs of dissection. D-dimer was negative. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was 241 pg/mL. The 2D transthoracic echocardiography showed mild left ventricular hypertrophy with grade 1 diastolic dysfunction with no signs of wall motion abnormalities. During the course of her hospitalization, the patient displayed no bradyarrhythmia on continuous telemetry monitoring. The patient was loaded with 324 mg orally (PO) aspirin and started on a nitroglycerin infusion at a rate of 5 µg/min, titratable for chest pain control. Due to unresolved chest pain within 48 h and the high risk for major adverse cardiac events, the patient underwent a diagnostic cardiac catheterization through the standard technique using the right common femoral artery access. The right coronary artery (RCA) was found to be large and dominant with mild disease. The left main coronary artery was patent with no disease. The mid-left anterior descending (LAD) artery showed stable, moderate to severe 70% stenosis. The left circumflex was angiographically normal. The left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was 25 mm Hg with normal systolic function. Due to no clear signs of ischemia and stable anatomy, the decision was made to manage medically and re-evaluate for percutaneous intervention if chest pain persists and is suspected to be of cardiac etiology. Within the next 3 days, the patient continued to have chest pain despite optimized medical management with aspirin 81 mg PO daily, labetalol PO 300 mg twice daily (BID), nitroglycerin infusion, and intravenous (IV) furosemide 40 mg BID. She was again taken to the Cath Lab for a physiological assessment of the coronary artery lesions and possible percutaneous interventions. Immediately preoperatively, the patient was loaded with ticagrelor 180 mg PO. Angiomax anticoagulation was given and a guidewire was introduced into the left coronary artery. The diastolic fractional reserve (DFR) of the first diagonal artery was found to be 0.98. The proximal LAD could not be accurately interrogated due to severe mid LAD outflow stenosis, so this was treated with a 2.5 × 12 mm drug-eluting stent deployed at 14 atm and further expanded with a 2.75 × 8 mm non-compliant balloon at 19 atm. DFR of the proximal LAD was 0.95 but it was decided to proceed with fractional flow reserve (FFR) to be certain the lesion was not significant. After calibration and equalization, a Comet Radiwire was maneuvered to the distal LAD and an infusion of IV adenosine at 140 µg/kg/min was initiated. Within seconds of starting the infusion of adenosine, the patient developed a sinus arrest and asystole for > 8 s, which resolved spontaneously with cessation of adenosine infusion.

The remainder of the procedure was aborted with a plan to continue medical management with aspirin, atorvastatin, labetalol, and ticagrelor. The post-procedure EKG had no changes compared to the baseline EKG, with normal rate and conduction intervals. One hour after the procedure, the patient’s telemetry monitor recorded multiple recurrent and symptomatic sinoatrial pauses and asystole for up to 10 s (Fig. 1). It was suspected immediately that ticagrelor was responsible given the temporal relationship and it was stopped and changed to clopidogrel. Aminophylline 50 mg IV was infused to block the adenosine effect but episodes recurred. It was then decided to place the patient in the cardiac intensive care unit and place a transvenous pacemaker.

Click for large image

Figure 1. Rhythm strip electrocardiography showing sinus pauses and sinus bradycardia.

The patient remained intermittently dependent on the transvenous pacemaker and received a permanent pacemaker after monitoring over 48 h. She was medically stable and discharged safely to home.

Ticagrelor is a novel direct antiplatelet agent that has shown superiority to the thienopyridine prodrug clopidogrel in preventing cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (9.8% vs. 11.7%, a 16% reduction) among patients with the ACS according to the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial [1]. Furthermore, the PLATO trial demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of cardiovascular (4.0% vs. 5.1%) and total (4.5% vs. 5.9%) mortality when comparing ticagrelor and clopidogrel, respectively. This has made it a preferred antiplatelet agent in ACS.

Ticagrelor also has been shown to inhibit the adenosine transporter receptor equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT1). The inhibition of ENT1 prevents the intracellular metabolism of adenosine, thereby increasing the half-life and concentration of adenosine in the blood [4]. Ticagrelor’s incremental effect on the biological levels of exogenous adenosine might explain the additional cardioprotection, anticoagulation effects, and anti-inflammatory effects. However, this feature may be responsible for some of the reported adverse pharmacological effects as well [5]. In addition to bleeding, “air hunger” dyspnea, nausea, and dizziness, bradyarrhythmia was reported. In a prospective PLATO study of 3,000 patients, Holter monitoring detected ventricular pauses in 6.0% of patients taking ticagrelor compared to 3.5% of patients taking clopidogrel in the acute phase of the trial (relative risk 1.61, P = 0.006). These pauses were mainly due to sinoatrial arrest. The phenomenon was noticed mainly during the first week of therapy. At 30 days follow-up, a low incidence of bradyarrhythmia was noted in both study groups with no significant difference. Notably, most sinoatrial pauses were asymptomatic as well [3]. Further studies demonstrated that the reported ventricular pauses were possibly related to a mechanism of ticagrelor independent of its action on ENT1, given that these arrhythmias were sinoatrial in origin and not due to an atrioventricular conduction block [3]. Though adenosine is known to cause an atrioventricular block, it still has some effect on modulating the hyperpolarization-activated current (If), as shown in rabbit myocytes [6]. These findings may still implicate an adenosine-induced sinoatrial dysfunction as a cause of the bradyarrhythmias through ticagrelor’s effect on ENT1. This may have been the cause of the bradyarrhythmias in our patient.

Our patient did not have electrophysiological abnormalities prior to ticagrelor administration. It is not fully understood why ventricular asystole occurred. The sinoatrial arrest and asystole may have been caused by an adenosine-mediated atrioventricular block or through the direct effect of ticagrelor on cardiac automaticity and the cardiac conduction system. Regardless of the etiology, the adenosine infusion during the FFR potentiated the bradyarrhythmic effect in our patient without previous electric conduction abnormalities.

Generally, ticagrelor is well tolerated. The conduction abnormalities induced are often asymptomatic without the need for a permanent pacemaker [1]. The abnormalities are sometimes even transient and resolve with discontinuation of ticagrelor [7]. However, a minority of patients did require pacemaker placement due to persistent sinoatrial disease, like the patient reported here [8]; however, unlike our patient, most of the patients requiring a pacemaker had some underlying conduction abnormality [7].

Ticagrelor is a novel antiplatelet agent with significant mortality and morbidity benefits in patients with cardiovascular disease. However, bradyarrhythmias are possible adverse event. Multiple mechanisms of action with ticagrelor contribute to this phenomenon, including involvement with the adenosine ENT1 receptor. Thus, when performing FFR with adenosine during cardiac catheterization, awareness of this potential ensuing arrhythmia in patients on ticagrelor is vital.

Acknowledgments

None to declare.

Financial Disclosure

None to declare.

Conflict of Interest

None to declare.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the patient before presentation of this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Each author has been individually involved in and has made substantial contributions to conceptions and designs, acquisition of data, analysis, interpretation of data, drafting and editing the manuscript. Assel Al-Bayati contributed to the designs, acquisition of data and analysis; Kyle Wiseman contributed to the analysis, interpretation of data and editing the manuscript; Ndausung Udongwo contributed to the designs, and editing the manuscript; Firas Ajam contributed to the interpretation of data; Riple Hansalia contributed to the interpretation of data; Renato Apolito contributed to the interpretation of data and editing of manuscript.

Data Availability

The authors declare that data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

1. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Held C, Horrow J, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1045-1057.
   doi pubmed
2. Waldmann V, Laredo M, Nigam A, Khairy P. Cyclical sinus bradycardia and atrioventricular block induced by ticagrelor. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2018;4(11):527-529.
   doi pubmed
3. Scirica BM, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Michelson EL, Harrington RA, Husted S, James S, et al. The incidence of bradyarrhythmias and clinical bradyarrhythmic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial: results of the continuous electrocardiographic assessment substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(19):1908-1916.
   doi pubmed
4. Armstrong D, Summers C, Ewart L, Nylander S, Sidaway JE, van Giezen JJ. Characterization of the adenosine pharmacology of ticagrelor reveals therapeutically relevant inhibition of equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2014;19(2):209-219.
   doi pubmed
5. Wittfeldt A, Emanuelsson H, Brandrup-Wognsen G, van Giezen JJ, Jonasson J, Nylander S, Gan LM. Ticagrelor enhances adenosine-induced coronary vasodilatory responses in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(7):723-727.
   doi pubmed
6. Zaza A, Rocchetti M, DiFrancesco D. Modulation of the hyperpolarization-activated current (I(f)) by adenosine in rabbit sinoatrial myocytes. Circulation. 1996;94(4):734-741.
   doi pubmed
7. De Maria E, Borghi A, Modonesi L, Cappelli S. Ticagrelor therapy and atrioventricular block: Do we need to worry? World J Clin Cases. 2017;5(5):178-182.
   doi pubmed
8. Goldberg A, Rosenfeld I, Nordkin I, Halabi M. Life-threatening complete atrioventricular block associated with ticagrelor therapy. Int J Cardiol. 2015;182:379-380.
   doi pubmed

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Journal of Medical Cases is published by Elmer Press Inc.